How to Justify Loving Animals More Than People
How to Justify Loving Animals More Than People
Credit: Waldemar Brandt |
As animal lovers, we're criticised for caring more about
animals than people.
But the truth is we're more likely to sympathise with
human suffering because we connect kindness to animals with caring for
vulnerable people.
Just like a helpless child or older person with
dementia who can't speak up for themselves, animals are voiceless and at
the mercy of human behaviour.
And let's be clear.
When someone says they love animals more than people, on the whole, they mean human beings as a collective species rather than individuals. Apart from their loved ones, many people prefer the joy of pets to the misery caused by homo sapiens.
For example, dogs have earned a reputation as man's best friend for a good reason. They show us loyalty, devotion and unconditional love.
So, generally speaking, animal lovers don't hate mankind, but we do
have a problem with 'man cruel'. And that applies whether it's the
mistreatment of animals or people.
For instance, humans allowing children to go hungry is
unforgivable, but here's what's utterly sickening...
Over 8oo million people are starving in the world. Meanwhile, 1.3 billion tons of food is
wasted due to over-indulgence and greed (enough to feed 3 BILLION people).
The human species is to blame for that shocking statistic – loving innocent
animals has nothing to do with it.
So whatever drives you to say 'I love animals more than people' (generally speaking), this post explores reasons why it can be justified.
Acting like animals
Let's be honest about this - are we people, or are we animals?
All life on Earth shares similar genes and is driven by the same
instincts. As a father, I love my
children dearly, but this applies to all parents, whether it's their lambs,
calves or kids.
So, apparently, it's our intelligence that separates us from animals.
But hang on...
Apes are also among the most intelligent beings on the planet.
"There is no fundamental difference between man and animals in
their ability to feel pleasure and pain, and happiness and misery." – Charles Darwin.
So, the only difference is that, unlike animals, people are responsible
for their actions.
And based on the behaviour of some homo sapiens, it's no wonder people
love animals more than humans.
At least you know what to expect from animals – the innocence of a child. The fact is animals are incapable of evil in
the literal sense (meaning profoundly immoral and wicked).
Their only crime is to be born a different species.
What's more, humans are the only animal on the planet that kill for sport. Yet, in a derogatory sense, an 'animal'
is a person that acts in a despicable manner.
People who enjoy tormenting defenceless beings for fun,
such as trophy hunters and other blood 'sport' savages, are obviously the 'animals' here.
On account of these cowards, many people that love wildlife hate human nature.
Even if we forget animals for a minute, people still hate humans for how
we've treated each other.
As a species, our record speaks for itself:
- We've murdered millions of
fellow humans through genocide, holocausts, slavery and starvation.
- We've jeopardised Earth by
causing a climate change catastrophe.
- We've created nuclear
missiles that ensure mankind's mutual destruction.
But wait a minute…
Surely homo sapien (meaning wise man) wouldn't be stupid enough to use
such murderous weapons? Shamefully, we
already have – not once but twice so far.
And even more sobering, the latest UN report warns that the threat of nuclear war is closer today than in the past 40 years.
Anyway, there you have it - reasons why animals are preferred over warmongering humans and people who abuse defenceless beings.
The truth is, just like humans, animals bleed and feel pain when cut. There's no difference and absolutely no
excuses.
Like it or not, ultimately, we're all animals. The problem is when people go around acting like 'animals'.
Pets and people
Most humans have an inbuilt affection for animals, similar to the love for our own children. Instinctively, we feel the urge to care for both because they're vulnerable and defenceless.
Credit: Nick Bondarev |
Fundamentally, we're supposed to protect animals, just as we would a child
Besides, humans
are designed to defend the underdog because it's in our own interests. We have
the power to think, 'what if that was me?', and therefore, employ empathy and pity.
As probably the most intelligent human ever, Albert Einstein advised:
"Our task must be to free ourselves by
widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole
of nature and its beauty…."
Whilst I don't get Einstein's theory of relativity, I do understand his
reasoning here.
Put simply...
If we protect animals and their habitats, we're saving local countrysides, rainforests, the planet and ultimately, ourselves.
Credit: Monicore Stawowy |
So, as the ultimate power on this planet, humans have a moral obligation towards all animals (including each other). The trouble is that too many people believe animals are unequal (never mind other races).
Indeed, many people are offended by the mere notion of animal rights. It's as if they fear humanity's 'special' status will be diminished.
Others distance themselves from 'inferior' animals and yet use them to justify immoral behaviour when it suits. For instance, hunters argue that because animals kill in the wild, then humans can too.
But animals act according to instinct. We can choose to behave based on conscience and moral judgment. Therefore, the excuse that if animals do something, then so can humans is ridiculous.
I mean, some animals sniff each other's backsides when they meet; should we do the same? Of course not. Apart from it being bad manners, we can choose a handshake instead.
So yes, nature can be cruel; however, humans don't have to be. We were gifted the power of sympathy to relieve suffering, not cause it.
If we wouldn't like it, we shouldn't do it to another species.
Credit: Harvey Sapir |
Especially those who treat their felines and canines like furry babies!
Abusing animals can be fatal
Surely people have more to worry about than animal welfare?
Strictly speaking, no, we don't.
Why?
Simple. We depend on animals for
our survival.
Humans face starvation without small creatures like bees pollinating plants, worms fertilising soil and spiders controlling insects that devour our crops.
Credit: Michael Hodgins |
Rather than treating animals with respect, we regard them as beneath us. Even worse, we've decimated their environments.
And the impact so far? Devastating droughts are just the tip of a melting iceberg. In addition, we've suffered scorching wildfires, raging storms and record temperatures.
Indeed this chaos proves one thing - that human beings are not above the natural world. We're supposed to be in awe of nature, not in contempt of it.
Credit: Pexels.com |
The good news is that we have the power (and insight) to prevent self-destruction. All we have to do is humble ourselves before Mother Nature.
The bad news is that it requires total commitment and cooperation from humanity. Oh, dear.
But, thankfully, our children are born with a natural love for animals, so they have a fighting chance.
"I believe that once we start behaving as if we were in an
existential crisis, then we can avoid a climate and ecological
breakdown." – Greta Thunberg
I'm not saying all youngsters will love dung beetles (after all, we're only human), but they have grasped their value to ecosystems. Plus, they've learnt that animal welfare is a moral duty linked to human welfare and saving the planet.
So, to summarise.
Essentially, love for animals is a natural emotion for humans, and so is fighting injustice. Achieving fairness for animals is only an aspiration, but it's our task to keep trying. Just as it is for the equality of the human race.
Indeed, showing sympathy for defenceless beings is the heart of humanity. Conversely, cruelty to animals is not only the act of a coward - but it's also a link to violence and abuse against people.
For instance, leading criminologist Dr Michelle
McManus reports that one of the three traits of serial killers is animal
cruelty.
And as the great philosopher Immanuel Kant argued:
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals…."
………………………………………………………
I'm intrigued to hear what you think?
(Please leave a comment or share below)
For regular posts and updates subscribe here
Comments
Post a Comment